ONE FUNERAL AT A TIME! Why we hold on to old ideas

Rosemary JOY WYSALL Sage

Abstract


This article discusses how easily we lock ourselves into established theories, which are often promoted within our formal education. They can blind us to new developments, influencing our professional practice and progress by narrowing thinking. Chomsky’s theory of Universal Grammar is an example, since this paradigm has dominated teaching and learning for over 50 years. It has led to a focus on the form of language, rather than its content and use, restricting learning approaches and contributing to lower standards of UK Education when compared with other countries. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (2016 & 17) attributes limited value for language as a reason for the UK being near the bottom of the global league.  Language development is presented within physical, mental, emotional and social aspects of communication. Competence across areas opens the mind to empathy, new experiences, continuous learning, humour, teamwork and cultural awareness. These elements together distinguish us from robots and are vital for our futures, as improved interaction of people is required for new job possibilities since machine technology is taking over routine work.  


Full Text:

PDF

References


Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of a Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Egglestone C., Stevens,C., Jones, E.& Aldridge, F. (2018) Adult Participation in Learning Survey 2017. Learningandwork.org.

Hughes E., Hughes M., Greenhill A.., Senghas A., Coppola M., Newport E. & Supalla T. (1997) in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Eds. Hughes E., Hughes M., Greenhill A. Boston: Cascadilla p. 550–561.

Jusczyk, P. (1997) The Discovery of Spoken Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mehrabian, A. (1971) Silent Messages. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.

Moore J., Stenning K., Snedeker J., Thorpe K. & Trueswell J. (2001) in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Eds. Moore J., Stenning K. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum, pp 964–969.

OECD Reports (2016 & 2017) The Development Cooperation & Education at a Glance.oecd.org/education.

Pinker S. (1994) The Language Instinct. New York: Morrow

Saffran, J. & Griepentrog, G. Dev Psychol 37:74–85, pmid: 11206435.

Sage, R. (2000) Class Talk. London: Bloomsbury.

Sage, R. (2009) Hitting the Million Word Jackpot: English as the Common International Language. Key Speech: The International Conference on Communication, Poland, 2009 INSTYTUT PSYCHOLOGII, WYDZIAŁ HUMANISTYCZNY UNIWERSYTETU SZCZECIŃSKIEGO.

Sage, R. (2017) Ed. Paradoxes in Education. Rotterdam, Boston, Taipei: SENSE Int. Pub.

Sage, R. (2018) Teachers Talking Tough on Tensions. Centre for Educational Development. University of Buckingham website.

Senghas A. & Coppola M. (2001) Psychol Sci 12:323–328, pmid: 11476100.

Silva, A. (2018) Our Memory’s Intricate Web. Scientific Revolutions in Science. SM Specials Vol. 27. No. 3. New York: Scientific American.

Tanenhaus M., Spivey-Knowlton M., Eberhard K. & Sedivy J. (1995) Science 268:1632–1634, pmid:7777863.

Trueswell J., Sekerina I., Hill N. & Logrip M. (1999) Cognition 73:89–134.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/bjll.v11i0.1633

www.bjll.org