Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Doing no harm: Addressing the quality of evidence in translating research to practice in preliminary research fields

Mei'En Lim, Corrine Reid

Abstract


Background: Current evidence appraisal rating systems, such as the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, are oriented toward and anchored by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as the gold standard methodology. In many fields, this standard of evidence is rarely, if ever, met. Often, research at the clinical application end of the translational process is embedded in real world practice that does not lend itself to RCTs and is characterised by more pragmatic research using mixed methodologies. Arguably, accountability through research evaluation is even more important in such cases where research design is preliminary and clinical impact is, often, already a reality. Further, practice translation must be privileged as the central goal of the research synthesis under such circumstances in that the destination of all clinical science is the person of the patient..

Methods: In response to these demand characteristics, a practitioner-informed research framework was used to drive and pilot development of an evidence quality grading system that could accommodate a disparate and oblique evidence base. Reid’s person-centered framework was used to establish whether clinician-derived criteria for quality research practice had been met.

Results: This brief report presents the Quality of Evidence Rating System (QERS) in the hope of facilitating discussion about accountability pathways for translational scientist-practitioners.

Conclusion: The QERS provides a scaffold to help when looking for evidence that researchers have consciously addressed the issues of evidence quality when reporting their research in the published literature.


Keywords


quality of evidence; mixed methods; translational research; person-centered; child interview

Full Text:

PDF

References


Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Vist, G., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., Schünemann, H.J. & GRADE Working Group. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal 336 (7650) 924-926.

Estape, E.S., Mays, M., Harigan, R. & Mayberry, R. (2014). Incorporating translational research with clinical research to increase effectiveness in healthcare for better health. Clinical and Translational Medicine 3, 20.

Peters, D.H., Adam, T., Alonge, O., Agyepong, I.A. & Tran, N. (2013). Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. British Medical Journal 347, f6753.

Reid C. (2013). Developing a research framework to inform an evidence base for person-centered medicine: keeping the person at the centre. European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare 1 (2) 336-342.

Lim, M. (2017). Heeding the silent partner in the parent-child relationship: A new agenda to translate research on children's perspectives into practice. Murdoch University, Perth, western Australia. Unpublished doctoral thesis.

Campbell, C.L., Collins, M. & Reid, C. (2013). Child-centric intervention research: The devil is in the detail. European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare 1 (2) 352-361.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v5i4.1365

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.