Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Improving patient reported outcomes in total hip replacement and total knee replacement: What can we learn from the “best” and the “poorest” performing sites?

Thomas W Wainwright, Kieran Gallagher, Athanasios Polllalis, Tikki Immins, Robert G Middleton

Abstract


Introduction: Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) and Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) are being collected as part of the Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) evaluation programme on total hip and knee replacement. This study compares the PROMs outcomes from best and poorest performing English hospitals, as defined by NHS England’s data of elective hip and knee surgery. This was to quantify the difference and identify the scope for improvement.

Materials and Methods: OHS and OKS were obtained from the Health and Social Care Information Centre for April 2013 to March 2014.

Results: Seven sites for OHS and 10 sites for OKS were above the upper 95% control limit. Fourteen sites for OHS and 10 sites for OKS were below the lower 95% control limit. Median pre-operative scores were similar between best and poorest performers. Median post-operative scores were 4 points higher in best performers. Top OHS-performers scored better in limping, stairs, work, transport, dressing and shopping. Top OKS-performers scored better in walking, shopping and kneeling.

Discussion: Pre-operative scores were similar for the best and poorest performers. The differences between best  and poorest performing hospitals for OHS and OKS were below the minimum important difference. There was only moderate consistency for outliers. Results for any single year should be treated with caution.

Conclusions: PROMs, one of many key tools in measuring and increasing person-centered healthcare, can be useful as part of an evaluation of practice but do not always reveal the full picture. It is important that balanced measures of quality should be used when benchmarking hospitals.

Keywords


Activities of daily living (ADLs), arthroplasty, case-mix, co-morbidity, efficiency targets, Oxford Hip Score, Oxford Knee Score, patient experience, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), performance management, person-centered healthcare, person-cen

Full Text:

PDF

References


NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Delivering Quality and Value. Focus on: Primary Hip and Knee Replacement. Available at: http://www.qualitasconsortium.com/index.cfm/reference-material/delivering-value-quality/focus-on-hip-and-knee-replacement/. Accessed 23 September 2016.

Hildon, Z., Neuburger, J., Allwood, D., van der Meulen, J. & Black, N. (2012). Clinicians’ and patients’ view of metrics of change derived from patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for comparing providers’ performance of surgery. BMC Health Services Research 12, 171-184.

Health and Social Care Information Centre. (2016). Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in England - A guide to PROMs methodology 2016. http://digital.nhs.uk/media/1537/A-Guide-to-PROMs-Methodology/pdf/PROMs_Guide_V8.pdf. Accessed 23 September 2016.

Care Quality Commission. (2015). Monitoring NHS acute hospitals. Available at: http://www.cqc.org.uk/public/hospital-intelligent-monitoring. Accessed 23 September 2016.

Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Commissioning for Quality and Innovation. Guidance for 2015/16. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/9-cquin-guid-2015-16.pdf. Accessed 23 September 2016.

Monitor and NHS England. NHS National Tariff Payment System 2016/17. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-national-tariff-payment-system-2016/17. Accessed 23 September 2016.

Varagunam, M., Hutchings, A., Neuburger, J. & Black, N. (2014). Impact on hospital performance of introducing routine patient reported outcome measures in surgery. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 19 (2) 77-84.

Judge, A., Arken, N.K., Batra, R.N., Thomas, G., Beard, D., Javaid, M.K., Cooper, C., Murray, D. & Exeter Primary Outcomes Study (EPOS) Group. (2013). The association of patient characteristics and surgical variables on symptoms of pain and function over 5 years following primary hip-replacement surgery: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 3 (3) pii: e002453.

Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Carr, A. & Murray, D. (1996). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 78 (2) 185-190.

Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Murray, D. & Carr, A. (1998). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 80 (1) 63-69.

Murray, D.W., Fitzpatrick, R., Rogers, K., Pandit, H., Beard, D.J., Carr, A.J. & Dawson, J. (2007). The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 89 (8) 1010-1014.

Lim, J.T., Luscombe, K.L., Jones, P.W. & White, S.H. (2006). The effect of preoperative symptom severity on functional outcome of total knee replacement-patients with the lowest preoperative scores achieve the lowest marks. Knee 13 (3) 216-219.

Beard, D.J., Harris, K., Dawson, J., Doll, H., Murray, D.W., Carr, A.J. & Price, A.J. (2015). Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 68 (1) 73-79.

Baker, P.N., Deehan, D.J., Lees, D., Jameson, S., Avery, P.J., Gregg, P.J. & Reed, M.R. (2012). The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 94 (8) 1058-1066.

Jameson, S.S., Mason, J.M., Baker, P.N., Elson, D.W., Deehan, D.J. & Reed, M.R. (2014). The impact of body mass index on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications following primary hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 29 (10) 1889-1898.

Health Quality Ontario. (2005). Physiotherapy rehabilitation after total knee or hip replacement: an evidence-based analysis. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series 5 (8) 1-91.

Mahomed, N., Wright, J.G., Hawker, G., Davis, A.M. & Badley, E.M. (2004). Randomized controlled trial of home based vs. inpatient rehab following total joint arthroplasty: functional outcomes and patient satisfaction [abstract] The Canadian Orthopaedic Association 59th Annual Meeting. 2004 Jun 17-20; Calgary, AB.

Monticone, M., Ambrosini, E., Rocca, B., Lorenzon, C., Ferrante, S. & Zatti, G. (2014). Task-oriented exercises and early full weight-bearing contribute to improving disability after total hip replacement: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 28, 658-668.

Horstmann, T., Listringhaus, R., Brauner, T., Grau, S. & Mündermann, A. (2013). Minimizing preoperative and postoperative limping in patients after total hip arthroplasty: relevance of hip muscle strength and endurance. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 92 (12) 1060-1069.

Mizner, R.L., Petterson, S.C. & Snyder-Mackler, L. (2005). Quadriceps strength and the time course of functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 35 (7) 424-436.

Mian, O.S., Thom, J.M., Narici, M.V. & Baltzopoulos, V. (2007). Kinematics of stair descent in young and older adults and the impact of exercise training. Gait Posture 25 (1) 9-17.

Nyland, J., Frost, K., Quesada, P., Angeli, C., Swank, A., Topp, R. & Malkani, A.L. (2007). Self-reported chair-rise ability relates to stair-climbing readiness of total knee arthroplasty patients: A pilot study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 44 (5) 751-759.

Hassaballa, M.A., Porteous, A.J. & Newman, J.H. (2004). Observed kneeling ability after total, unicompartmental and patellofemoral knee arthroplasty: perception versus reality. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 12, 136-139.

Schai, P.A., Gibson, A.J. & Scott, R.D. (2001). Kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 367, 195-200.

Mulholland, S.J. & Wyss, U.P. (2001). Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 24, 191-198.

Nicholls, M.A., Selby, J.B. & Hartford, J.M. (2002). Athletic activity after total joint replacement. Orthopaedics 25, 1283-1287.

Browne, J., Jamieson, L., Lewsey, J., van der Meulen, J., Black, N. & Cairns, J. (2007). Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Elective Surgery, Report to the Department of Health, UK. 2007. Available at: https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/php/departmentofhealthservicesresearchandpolicy/assets/proms_report_12_dec_07.pdf. Accessed 23 September 2016.

Judge, A., Arden, N.K., Kiran, A., Price, A., Javaid, M.K., Beard, D., Murray, D. & Field, R.E. (2012). Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 94 (3) 412-418.

Browne, J.P., Bastaki, H. & Dawson, J. (2013). What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? A systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 11, 128.

Hutchings, A., Neuburger, J., van der Meulen, J. & Black, N. (2014). Estimating recruitment rates for routine use of patient reported outcome measures and the impact on provider comparisons. BMC Health Services Research 14 (1) 1-17.

Neuburger, J., Cromwell, D.A., Hutchings, A., Black, N. & van der Meulen, J.H. (2011). Funnel plots for comparing provider performance based on patient-reported outcome measures. BMJ Quality & Safety 20, 1020-1026.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v6i1.1367

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.