Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Audit of the use of Seclusion in an Approved Centre following introduction of an Integrated Care Pathway

Sorcha McManus, Patrick McLaughlin, Olwyn Cranny, Peter Whitty

Abstract


Introduction: The Mental Health Commission (MHC) has published guidelines on the rules governing the use of seclusion. These must be followed and the use of seclusion recorded in the patient’s clinical file during each seclusion episode. We devised a Seclusion Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) for use in the Approved Centre in Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland. This document was developed in conjunction with the MHC guidelines to assist in the recording and monitoring of each seclusion episode.

Methods: The MHC has listed 13 rules governing the use of seclusion. These include the responsibility of the registered medical practitioner (RMP), nursing staff and the levels of observations and frequency of reviews that must take place during each seclusion episode. Using the seclusion register we identified a total of 60 seclusion episodes; 30 prior to the introduction of the ICP and 30 following the introduction of the ICP. We conducted a retrospective chart review to assess the documentation of each seclusion episode. The purpose of this audit was to compare adherence to MHC codes of practice on the use of seclusion before and after the introduction of our ICP.

Results: There was overall improvement in adherence following the introduction of the ICP. Areas of improvement included consultant notification, informing the patient of the reasons for and likely duration of seclusion, informing the next of kin, 15 minute nursing observations and 2-hourly nursing review. Medical reviews within 4 hours, documentation of whether seclusion could be discontinued and subsequent medical assessment disimproved following introduction of the ICP.

Conclusion: While an ICP is a robust document and ensures that many of the rules in relation to seclusion are explicitly stated adjustments to the document and regular staff training are needed to ensure full adherence to MHC guidelines.

Keywords


Approved Centres, documentation, evidence-based practice, guideline adherence, guidelines, implementation, integrated care pathway (ICP), interprofessional relationships, Mental Health Act, Mental Health Commission, multidisciplinary care, organisational

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mental Health Commission. (2010). Rules governing the use of Seclusion and Mechanical Means of Bodily Restraint, 2009. Available at: www.mhcirl.ie Accessed 10th February 2017.

Hoekstra, T., Lendemeijer, H.H. & Jansen, M.G. (2004). Seclusion: The Inside Story. Journal of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing 11 (3) 276-283.

Bongers, I,. Reek, E., Roman, B., Wijngaart, M., Balogh, L. & Dijk, A. (2010). Seclusion in Mental Health Care, Policy, Practice and Supervision, IVA. Social Research and Consultancy, Tilburg, 2010.

Noorthoorn, E., Lepping, P., Janssen, W., Hoogendoorn, A,. Nijman, H., Widdershoven, G. & Steinert, T. (2015). One-year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology 50 (12) 1857-1869.

Mental Health Commission. (2015). The use of seclusion, mechanical means of bodily restraint and physical restraint in approved centres: Activities Report 2012. Available at: www.mhcirl.ie/File/The-Use-of-Sec-and-Res-in-ACs-Activities-Report-2013.pdf.

Middleton, S., Barnett, J. & Reeves, D.S. (2001). What is an integrated care pathway? Hayward Medical Communications. Available at: www.gimble.org/library/methodological/ebha_cg/icp.html.

Allen, D. (2013). Situated context for quality improvement purposes: artefacts, affordances and socio-technical infrastructure. Health 17 (5) 460-477.

Fox, R., Moran, S. & MacCormack, A. (2003). Guidance for integrated care pathways. Journal of Integrated Care Pathways 7 (3) 100-105.

Latibeaudiere, M., Phillips, J., Siassakos, D., Winter, C., Draycott, T. & Fox, R. (2013). Implementation strategies–moving guidance into practice. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist 15 (1) 51-57.

Campbell, H., Hotchkiss, R., Bradshaw, N. & Porteous, M. (1998). Integrated care pathways. British Medical Journal 316 (7125) 133-137.

Pinder, R., Petchey, R., Shaw, S. & Carter, Y. (2006). What’s in a care pathway? Towards a cultural cartography of the new NHS. In: The Social Organisation of Healthcare Work. Allen, D. & Pilnick, A. (eds). Oxford: Blackwell.

Hindle, D. & Yazbeck, A. (2005). Clinical pathways in 17 European Union countries: a purposive survey. Australian Health Review 29 (1) 94-104.

Freeman, T. (2002). Using performance indicators to improve health care quality in the public sector: a review of the literature. Health Services Management Research 15 (2) 126-137.

Allen, D. (2015). Lost in translation? ‘Evidence’ and the articulation of institutional logics in integrated care pathways: from positive to negative boundary object? Sociology of Health & Illness 36 (6) 807-822.

Waring, J. (2007). Adaptive regulation or governmentality: patient safety and the changing regulation of medicine. Sociology of Health & Illnesss 29 (2) 163-179.

Inspector of Mental Health Services 2013 Summary of Inspection Reports. Available at: www.mhcirl.ie/File/IRs/IR_SumRep281113.pdf. Accessed 20th February 2017.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v6i2.1432

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.