College football and the Vegas line: Deconstruction and arbitrage

Article Sidebar

Requires Subscription or Fee PDF (GBP 25)
Published: Sep 20, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5750/jpm.v10i1.1183
Keywords:
College football mispricing Vegas line bookmakers

Main Article Content

McDonald Paul Mirabile
Sports Analytics Consulting, LLC
Mark David Witte
College of Charleston, Sports Analytics Consulting, LLC

Abstract

We examine the Vegas line in college football games by employing two separate regression models to deconstruct the Vegas line and actual margin of victory for 4,590 unique contests from the 2005 through 2011 seasons. A comparison of these two models suggests which factors represent a true relationship with the margin of victory and which reflect bettor biases. An additional model of the margin of victory illustrates which factors the Vegas line systematically misrepresents. The authors find a number of factors inadequately priced in the Vegas line that help explain variation in the actual margin of victory. Using a holdout dataset comprised of the 2012 and 2013 seasons we identify the magnitude of any mispricing and opportunities for arbitrage. We exploit this mispricing to develop and evaluate profitable betting strategies. A strategy betting on the top 35% mispriced games yields 55% correct picks and a 2.7% APY.  A second strategy in which only the top 8% of mispriced games are bet yields 59% correct picks and a 5.9% APY.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2016)
Section
Articles

References

Fair, Ray C., and John F. Oster, 2007. College Football Rankings and Market Efficiency, Journal of Sports Economics, Vol. 8, No. 1, February, 3-18.

Farinella, Joseph, and Clay M. Moffett, 2013. Market Efficiency and Behavioral Biases in SEC Football: The Over-Under Wager, Academy of Economics and Finance Journal, Vol. 4, 15-20.

Fodor, Andy, 2012. The Power of Wagering on Power Conferences, The Journal of Prediction Markets, Vol.7, No. 1, 13-25.

Kain, Kyle .J. and Trevon D. Logan, 2014. Are Sports Betting Markets Prediction Markets?: Evidence From a New Test, Journal of Sports Economics, Vol. 15, No. 1, February, 45-63.

Kuester, Daniel D., and Shane Sanders, 2011. Regional information and market efficiency: the case

of spread betting in United States college football, Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 35, No. 1, January, 116-122.

Levitt, Steven, 2004. Why are Gambling Markets Organised so Differently from Financial Markets?, The Economic Journal, Vol. 114, No. 1, April, 223-246.

Paul, Rodney J., and Andy P. Weinbach, 2005. Bettor preferences and market efficiency in football totals markets, Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 29, No. 3, September, 409-415.

Paul, Rodney J., and Andy P. Weinbach, 2007. Does Sportsbook.Com Set Pointspreads to Maximize Profits? Tests of the Levitt Model of Sportsbook Behavior, The Journal of Prediction Markets, Vol. 1, No. 3, 209-218.

Paul, Rodney J., and Andy P. Weinbach, 2009. Sportsbook Behavior in the Ncaa Football Betting Market: Tests of the Traditional and Levitt Models of Sportsbook Behavior, The Journal of Prediction Markets, Vol. 3, No. 2, August, 21-37.

Paul, Rodney J., and Andy P. Weinbach, 2009. National television coverage and the behavioral bias of bettors: The American college football totals market, International Gambling Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, March, 55-66.

Paul, Rodney J., Andy P. Weinbach and Eric Higger, 2012. The “large-firm” effect? Bettor preferences and market prices in NCAA football, The Journal of Prediction Markets, Vol. 7, No. 2, 29-41.

Sinkey, Michael, and Trevon Logan, 2013. Does the Hot Hand Drive the Market? Evidence from Betting Markets, Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 40, No. 4, September, 1-21.

Stern, Hal S., 1997. How Accurately Can Sports Outcomes Be Predicted?, in the column "A Statistician Reads the Sports Pages, Chance, Vol. 10, No. 4, 19-23.