EVIDENCE ON THE FAVORITE-LONGSHOT BIAS AS A SUPPLY-SIDE PHENOMENON

Main Article Content

Matti Metsola

Abstract

The favorite-longshot bias has been referred to as the most longstanding empirical regularity in literature concerning decision-making under uncertainty, as well as a central theme of the literature on betting. However, it has defied authoritative explanation to date. Several attempts have been offered to explain the bias. They can be divided to two main categories: demand-oriented and supply-oriented explanations. This article argues in favour of supply-side explanations. The study is based on comparison of bookmaker odds to betting exchange odds in three betting markets. The data obtained illustrate that the disparity between bookmaker odds and betting exchange prices increases rapidly as the implied probability of the event decreases. This provides an explanation of the favorite-longshot bias which is consistent with earlier empirical research, showing declining expected returns on bets as odds increase. In addition, this explanation is consistent with the evidence concerning the volume of bets actually received by bookmakers.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Brown, W. and Sauer, R. (1993), Fundamentals or Noise? Evidence from the Professional Basketball Betting Market. Journal of Finance, 48, 1193-209.

Cain, M., Law, D. and Peel, D. (2000), The Favourite-Longshot Bias and Market Efficiency in UK Football Betting. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 47, 25-36.

Camerer, C.F. (1989), Does the Basketball Betting Market Believe in the Hot Hand? American Economic Review, 79, 1257-61.

Coleman, L. (2004), New Light on the Longshot Bias. Applied Economics, 36, 315-26.

Eadington, W.R. (1999), The Economics of Casino Gambling. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13, 173-92

Gandar, J.M., Dare W., Brown C. and Zuber R. (1998), Informed Traders and Price Variations in the Betting Market for Professional Basketball Games, Journal of Finance, 53, 385-401.

Golec, J. and Tamarkin, M. (1991), The degree of inefficiency in the football betting market: Statistical tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 30, 311-23.

Golec, J. and Tamarkin, M. (1995), Do Bettors Prefer Long Shots Because They Are Risk Lovers, or Are They Just Overconfident? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 11, 51–64.

Golec, J. and Tamarkin, M. (1998), Bettors Love Skewness, Not Risk, at the Horse Track. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 205-225.

Gray P.K. and Gray S.F. (1997), Testing Market Efficiency: Evidence from the NFL Sports Betting Market. Journal of Finance, 52, 1725-37.

Hausch, D.B., Lo, V.S.Y. and Ziemba W.T. (2008), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets, World Scientific Publishing Company. Singapore.

Henery, R.J. (1985), On the Average Probability of Losing Bets on Horses with Given Starting Price Odds. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 148, 342-9.

Hetherington, R.A. (2006), Betting Against Efficiency: Behavioral Finance in an NFL Gambling Exchange, one-term senior essay available online at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=881514.

Jullien, B. and Salanié, B. (2008), "Empirical Evidence on the Preferences of Racetrack Bettors" in Handbook of Sports and Lottery Markets (eds. Hausch, D.B. and Ziemba, W.T.), North-Holland/Elsevier, 27-50.

Koch, A.K. and Shing, H.F. (2008), Bookmaker and Pari-Mutuel Betting: Is a (Reverse) Favourite-Longshot Bias Built-In? Journal of Prediction Markets, 2, 29-50.

Levitt, S. (2004), Why are gambling markets organized so differently from financial markets. The Economic Journal, 114, 223-46.

Ottaviani, M. and Sørensen, P.N. (2003), Late Informed Betting and the Favourite-Longshot Bias, CEPR Discussion Papers, DP4092.

Ottaviani, M. and Sørensen, P.N. (2008), "The Favorite-Longshot Bias: An Overview of the Main explanations", in Handbook of Sports and Lottery Markets (eds. Hausch, D.B. and Ziemba, W.T.), North-Holland/Elsevier, 83-102.

Paul, R. and Weinbach A. (2007), Does Sportsbook.com Set Pointspreads to Maximize Profits? Tests of the Levitt Model of Sportsbook Behavior. Journal of Prediction Markets, 1, 209-218.

Paul, R. and Weinbach A. (2009), Sportsbook Behavior in the NCAA Football Betting Market: Tests of the Traditional and Levitt Models of Sportsbook Behavior. Journal of Prediction Markets, 3, 21-37.

Preston, F.W., Bernhard B.J., Hunter R.E. and Bybee S.L. (1998), Gambling as Stigmatized Behavior: Regional Relabeling and the Law. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 556, 186-96.

Quandt, R.E. (1986), Betting and Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 201-207.

Shin, H.S. (1991), Optimal Betting Odds Against Insider Traders. Economic Journal, 101, 1179–85.

Shin, H.S. (1992), Prices of State Contingent Claims with Insider Traders, and the Favourite-Longshot Bias. Economic Journal, 102, 426-35.

Shmanske, S. (2005), Odds-setting efficiency in gambling markets: Evidence from the PGA Tour. Journal of Economics and Finance, 29, 391-402.

Smith, M.A., Paton, D. and Vaughan Williams, L. (2006), Market Efficiency in Person-to-Person Betting. Economica, 73, 673-89.

Snowberg, E. and Wolfers, J. (2010), Explaining the Favorite-Longshot Bias: Is it Risk-Love, or Misperceptions? NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 15923.

Swensen, D. (2000), Pioneering Portfolio Management: An Unconventional Approach to Institutional Investment, Free Press, New York.

Thaler, R.H. and Ziemba, W.T. (1988), Anomalies: Parimutuel Betting Markets: Racetracks and Lotteries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 161-74.

Vaughan Williams, L. and Paton, D. (1997), Why is There a Favourite-Longshot Bias in British Racetrack Betting Markets? Economic Journal, 107, 150-8.

Waring, B.M. and Siegel, L.B. (2003), The Dimensions of Active Management. Journal of Portfolio Management, 29, 35-51.

Winter, S. and Kukuk, M. (2006), Risk Love and the Favorite-Longshot Bias: Evidence from German Harness Horse Racing. Schmalenbach Business Review, 58, 349-64.

Woodland, L.M. and Woodland, B.M. (1994), Market Efficiency and the Favorite-Longshot Bias: The Baseball Betting Market. Journal of Finance, 49, 269-79.