PREDICTION MARKETS AND CONTRACT DESIGN
Main Article Content
Abstract
Traditionally, the main function of prediction markets (PMs) has been to provide information about probabilities for various events. Good information requires a well-functioning market, which in turn depends on sufficient liquidity and a sufficient number of market participants. While many of the early PMs have been of a more experimental nature, with students or other test groups as market participants, a natural assumption is that future PMs must be able to attract market participants to be successful.We assume that four main groups of stakeholders face potential gains from a well-functioning PM contract: The exchange launching the contract; hedgers; gamblers; and users of the market information, whether this is a corporation or society as a whole.In this paper, we analyze different design characteristics of PM contracts, mainly in light of previous studies of futures markets. A relatively extensive literature exists on the design of futures contracts, and a number of criteria have been established to predict whether a contract is likely to be successful. We use this to provide some recommendations for contract design, in order to develop contracts that maximize the gain for the four groups of stakeholders.
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
References
J Bergfjord, ‘Is there a future for salmon futures? An analysis of a potential futures market for salmon’ Aquaculture Economics & Management (2007) 11 113-132.
D Black ‘Success and Failure of Futures Contracts: Theory and Empirical Evidence’ Monograph, (Salomon Brothers Center for the Study of Financial Institutions, New York, 1986)
W L Silber, ‘Innovation, competition, and new contract design in futures markets’ Journal of Futures Markets (1981) 1 123–155.
G Tziralis and I Tatsiopoulos ‘Prediction markets: an extended literature review’ Journal of Prediction Markets (2006) 1 75-91.
J Wolfers and E Zitzewitz ‘Prediction markets’ Journal of Economic Perspectives (2004) 18(2) 107–126.