AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF CHOICES BETWEEN GAMBLES OF CHILDREN AND ADULTS IN CHINA

Article Sidebar

Requires Subscription or Fee PDF (GBP 25)
Published: Jan 2, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5750/jgbe.v4i1.548
Keywords:
Probability Weighting Children Risk

Main Article Content

David Peel
Lancaster University
Ivan Paya
Jie Zhang Jie Zhang

Abstract

In a unique study Harbaugh, Krause and Vesterlund (2002), reported the interesting result that children exhibit different probability weighting to adults. In particular, children underweighted small probabilities. An objective of this paper is to re-examine this issue employing children respondents from a different ethnic background. Overall, our results for Chinese children (age 4-6) are broadly consistent with those of Harbaugh, Krause and Vesterlund (2002) in that over a range of low probabilities they appear to underweight small probabilities though not for the smallest probabilities. The outcomes for Chinese high school students, aged 11-14, are similar to those for children in some respects and broadly consistent with the results reported by  Harbaugh, Krause and Vesterlund (2002). Our results for Chinese adults (age 20-57) are not consistent with the results reported for Western respondents but are consistent with those reported for some non-western respondents.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2010)
Section
Articles

References

Abdellaoui, M. 2000. “Parameter-free Elicitation of Utilities and Probability Weighting Functions”, Management Science, 46, 1497-1512.

Allais, M. 1953. “Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine”, Econometrica, 21, 503-546.

Arkes, H., Hirshleifer, D., Jiang, D. and Lim, S. 2007. "A Cross-Cultural Study of Reference Point Adaptation: Evidence from the China, Korea, and the US," MPRA Paper 4009, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Aug 2008.

Battalio, R. C., Kagel, J. H. and Jiranyakul, K. 1992. “Testing Between Alternative Models of Choice Under Uncertainty: Some Initial Results”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 3:1, 25-50.

Bombardini, M. and Trebbi, F. 2006. “Risk Aversion and EU Theory: A Field Experiment with Large and Small Stakes”, Working Paper 05-20. Department of Economics, University of British Columbria.

Bruce, A. C. and Johnson, J. E. V. 1992. “Toward an explanation of betting as a leisure pursuit”, Leisure Studies, 11:3, 201-218.

Edwards, w. 1955. “The Prediction of Decisions Among Bets”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50:3, 201-214.

Etchart-Vincent, N. 2004. “Is Probability Weighting Sensitive to the Magnitude of Consequences? An Experimental Investigation on losses”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28, 217-235.

Fox, C. R., Rogers, B. A. and Tversky, A. 1996. “Options Traders Exhibit Subadditive Decision Weights”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 13:1, 5-17.

Friedman, M. and Savage, L. J. 1948. "The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk", The Journal of Political Economy, 56:4, 279-304.

Gonzalez, R. and Wu, G. 1999. “On the Form of the Probability Weighting Function.”, Cognitive Psychology, 38,129-166.

Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K. and Vesterlund, L. 2002. “Risk Attitudes of Children and Adults: Choices Over Small and Large Probability Gains and Losses”, Experimental Economics, 5, 53-84.

Harrison, G. W., List, J. and Towe, C. 2007. “Naturally Occurring Preferences and Exogenous Laboratory Experiments: A Case Study of Risk Aversion”, Econometrica, 75:2, 433-458.

Hartog, J., Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A, and Jonker, N. 2002. “Linking Measured Risk Aversion to Individual Characteristics”, Kyklos 55:1, 3-26.

Hershey, J. C. and Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1980. “Prospect Theory’s Reflection Hypothesis: A Critical Examination,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 395—418.

Hertwig, Ralph and Ortmann, Andreas. 2001. “Experimental Practices in Economics: A Methodological Challenge for Psychologists?”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 383-451.

Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. 2002. “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects”, American Economic Review, 92:5, 1644-1655.

Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. 2005. “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects: New Data without Order Effects”, American Economic Review, 95:3, 902-904.

Humphrey, S. J. and Verschoor, A. 2004. “The Probability Weighting Function: Experimental Evidence From Uganda, India and Ethiopis”, Economics Letter, 84:3, 419-425.

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk”, Econometrica, 47, 313-327.

Kachelmeier, S. J. and Shehata, M. 1992. "Examining Risk Preferences Under High Monetary Incentives: Experimental Evidence from the People's Republic of China", American Economic Review 82:5, 1120-1141.

Kilka, M. and Weber, M. 2001. “What Determines the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function Under Uncertainty?”, Management Science, 47:12, 1712-1726.

Lopes, L. L. and Oden, G. C. 1999. “The Role of Aspiration Level in Risky Choice: A Comparison of Cumulative Prospect Theory and SP/A Theory”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 43, 286—313.

Markowitz, Harry, M. 1952 “The Utility of Wealth”, Journal of Political Economy, 56, 151-154.

Mattos, F., Garcia, P. and Pennings, J. M. E. 2007. “Insights into Trader Behavior: Risk Aversion and Probability Weighting.” Proceedings of the NCCC-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management. Chicago, IL.

Mellers, B. A., Berretty, P. M. & Birnbaum, M. H. 1995. “Dominance violations in judged prices of two- and three-outcome gambles”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 8, 201–216.

Prelec, D. 1998. “The Probability Weighting Function”, Econometrica, 66:3, 497-528.

Preston, M. G. and Baratta, P. 1948. “An Experimental Study of the Auction-value of an Uncertain Outcome”, American Journal of Psychology, 61, 183-193.

Rabin, M. 2000. “Risk Aversion and Expected-utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem”, Econometria, 68:5, 1281-1292.

Schmidt, U. and Zank, H. 2008. “Risk Aversion in Cumulative Prospect Theory”, Management Science, 54:1, 208-216.

Starmer, C. 2000. "Developments in Non-expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, 38:2, 332-382.

Stott H. P. 2006. “Cumulative Prospect Theory’s Functional Menagerie”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32:2, 101-130

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5:4, 297-323.

Yaari, M. E. 1987. “The Dual Theory of Choice Under Risk”, Econometrica, 55:1, 95-115.

Yaniv, I., & Schul, Y. 1997. “Elimination and Inclusion Procedures in Judgment”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 211-220.