ESTIMATING SOCCER RESULTS IN THE ISRAELI LEAGUE

Main Article Content

Nissim Ben-David
Ben David Evyatar

Abstract

In this paper, we suggest a method that uses past soccer tournament results to estimate the probabilities for the various possible scores of soccer game matches.Given forecasted probabilities, we try to have the best guess for bets concerning the results in the Israeli league. We applied the method for estimating the probabilities of wining, losing or ending in a tie for any possible future match amongst the sixteen premier Israeli league teams. The method we suggest may be used for sport bets for decreasing cost while improving the probability of success.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Allen, W. D. (2005). Cultures of illegality in the National Hockey League. Southern Economic Journal, 71, 494-513.

Baumeister, R. F. (1995). Disputing the effects of championship pressures and home audiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 644-648.

Ben David Nissim (2010) A Model for Estimating the Probabilities of Winning, reaching a Tie, or Losing in a Soccer Game, The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics Vol 4 No 3 pp 13-19.

Bray, S. R. (1999). The home advantage from an individual team perspective. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 116-125.

Carron, A. V., & Hausenblas, H. A. (1998). Group dynamics in sport, (2nd ed). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

Chelladurai, P. (1990). Leadership in sports: A review. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21, 328-354.

Courneya, K. S., & Carron, A. V. (1991). Effects of travel and length of home stand/road trip on the home advantage. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13, 42-49.

Courneya, K. S., & Carron, A. V. (1992). The home advantage in sport competitions: A literature review. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 13-27.

Edwards, J., & Archambault, D. (1989). The home-field advantage. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

French, J., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

Garland, D. J., & Barry, J. R. (1990). Personality and leader behaviors in collegiate football: A multidimensional approach to performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 24(3), 355-370.

Gordon, S. (1988). Decision styles and coaching effectiveness in university soccer. Canadian Journal of Sport Science, 13(1), 36-55.

Home, T., & Canon, A. V. (1985). Compatibility in coach-athlete relationships. Journal of Sport Behavior, 7(2), 137-149.

Koppet, L. (1972, January 9). Home court: Winning edge. New York Times, pp. 1, 3. Kornspan, A. S.,.

Laughlin, N., & Laughlin, S. (1994). The relationship between the similarity in perceptions of teacher/coach leader behavior and evolution of their effectiveness. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 22, 396-410.

Maby, R. K. (1997). The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and group cohesion in professional football. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University.

McCormick, R. E., & Tollison, R. D. (1984). Crime on the court. Journal of Political Economy, 92, 223-235.

Moore, J. C., & Brylinsky, J. (1995). Facility familiarity and the home advantage. Journal of Sport Behavior, 18,302-311.

Pace, A., & Carron, A. V. ( 1992). Travel and the home advantage. Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Sport, 17, 60-64.

Riemer, H. A. (2007). Multidimensional model of coach leadership. In S. Jowett & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 5-74). Chicago, IL: Human Kinetics.

Riemer, H. A., & Chelladurai, P. (1995). Leadership and satisfaction in athletics. Journal of Span and Exercise Psychology, 17, 276-293.

Summers, R. J. (1991). The association between athletes' perceptions of their abilities on the influence of coach technical-instruction. Journal of Sport Behavior, 14(1), 30-40.

Wann, D. L., Metcalf, L. ?., Brewer, K. R., & Whiteside, H. D. (2000). Development of the Power in Sport Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23, 423-443.