Forecasting the decisions of the US Supreme Court: lessons from the ‘affordable care act’ judgment

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Oct 13, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5750/jpm.v9i2.1094

Main Article Content

Leighton Vaughan Williams
University of Nottingham

Abstract

This paper examines the 2012 US Supreme Court consideration of the Affordable Care Act, and the resulting judgment, with a view to learning what lessons this landmark case can afford us into the way in which the US Supreme Court works, so helping us forecast its decisions. Although this is simply one judgment among many, a case is advanced here that the details of the way that the judgment was made can be used to help arbitrate between conflicting interpretations in the literature as to the way that the US Supreme Court reaches its decisions. It is argued that consideration of this case does provide particular insights which might usefully improve forecasts of future Supreme Court decisions.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 9 No. 2 (2015)
Section
Articles

References

American Bar Association, Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases. 2012. Special Edition, Health Care and the High Court.

Bailey, Michael A., 2007. Comparable Preference Estimates Across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress, and Presidency, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 51, No. 3, July, 433-448.

Bailey, Michael A. and Forrest Maltzman, 2011. The Constrained Court: Law, Politics, and the Decisions Justices Make, Princeton University Press.

Bailey, Michael A. and Forrest Maltzman, 2008. Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court, American Political Science Review, Vol. 102, No. 3, August, 369-384.

Baumgartner, Frederic J., 2003. A History of the Papal Elections, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Baumgartner, Frederic J., 1985. Henry II and the Papal Conclave of 1549, Sixteenth Century Journal, XVI, No. 3, pp. 301-314.

Black, Ryan C., Sarah A. Treul, Timothy R. Johnson and Jerry Goldman, 2011. Emotions, Oral Arguments and Supreme Court Decision Making, Journal of Politics 73(2): 572-581 (April).

Blackman, Josh, Adam Aft and Corey M. Carpenter, Jr., 2012. Fantasy SCOTUS: Crowdsourcing a Prediction Market for the Supreme Court, Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, vol. 10, 3.

Casillas, Christopher J., Peter K. Enns and Patrick C. Wohlfarth, 2011. How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 55, Issue 1, 74-88.

Cherry, Miriam A. and Robert L. Rogers, 2006. Tiresias and the Justices: Using Information Markets to Predict Supreme Court Decisions, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 100, No. 3, 1141-1196.

Epstein, Lee, William M. Landes and Richard A. Posner, 2010. Inferring the Winning Party in the Supreme Court from the Pattern of Questioning at Oral Argument, Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 39, 2, 433-467.

Farnsworth, Ward, 2007. The Uses and Limits of Martin-Quinn Scores to Assess Supreme Court Justices, with Special Attention to the Problem of Ideological Drift, Northwestern University Law Review, 101: 4, 1891-1904, April.

Hunt, John yungM., 2012. The Conclave from the “Outside In”: Rumor, Speculation and Disorder in Rome during Early Modern Papal Elections, Journal of Early Modern History, 16, 355-382.

Malphurs, Ryan A., 2013. Rhetoric and Discourse in Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Sensemaking in Judicial Decisions, Routledge Studies in Rhetoric and Communication, NY: Routledge.

Martin, Andrew D., Kevin M. Quinn, Theodore W. Ruger and Pauline T. Kim, 2004. Competing Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making. Perspectives on Politics. Vol. 4, December: 761-767.

Martin, Andrew D. and Kevin M. Quinn, 2002. Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999, Political Analysis, 10:2, 134-153.

Martin, Andrew D. and Kevin M. Quinn, 2007. Assessing Preference Change on the US Supreme Court, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, May, 1-21.

Rhode, Paul W., and Koleman S. Strumpf, 2004. Historical Presidential Betting Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (2): 127-141.

Rhode, Paul W., and Koleman S. Strumpf, 2008. Historical Political Futures Markets: An International Perspective. NBER Working Paper No. 14377. October.

Rhode, Paul W., and Koleman S. Strumpf, 2013. The Long History of Political Betting Markets: An International Perspective. In: The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Gambling. NY: Oxford University Press, ed. Leighton Vaughan Williams and Donald S. Siegel..

Roberts, John G. Jr., 2005. Oral Advocacy and the Re-emergence of a Supreme Court Bar.” Journal of Supreme Court History, 30 (1): 68-81.

Ruger, Theodore W., Pauline T. Kim, Andrew D. Martin, and Kevin M. Quinn. 2004. The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decision-Making. Columbia Law Review. 104: 1150-1209.

Segal, Jeffrey A. and Harold J. Spaeth, 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge University Press.

Stimson, James A., 1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Stimson, James A., 2004. Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Thoreau, Henry David, 1967. The Variorum Civil Disobedience. New York: Twayne.

Whissel, Cynthia, 1989. The Dictionary of Affect in Language. In: Theory, Research, and Experience, Robert Plutchik and Henry Kellerman (eds.). New York: Academic Press. 113-131.

Yung, Corey Rayburn, 2010. Judged by the Company You Keep: An Empirical Study of the Ideologies of Judges on the United States Court of Appeals, Boston College Law Review, Vol. 51, 1133-1208.

Zeelenberg, Marcel, Rob M.A. Neilssen, Seger M. Breugelmans and Rik Pieters, 2008. On Emotion Specificity in Decision Making: Why Feeling is for Doing. Judgment and Decision Making. Vol. 3 (1): 18-27.